The modernist Catholics are identical to the woke Democrats. When the Democrats are finding themselves loosing an argument they will always use the race card as a last resort. “Ya, well I don’t agree with you so that makes you a racist”. Only with the Catholic Mod squad (that would be the modernists, if your from Rio Linda as Rush might say), if you don’t agree you are guilty of serious sin and might wind up in hell. No wonder we got a lot of confused Catholics running around.
If you adhere to your basic Catholic doctrine and disagree like when the Leo said “Christ did not work miracles in feeding the 5,000, it was all about sharing”. You see you better accept Leo’s claim that it was all about the crowd sharing their lunchable snakes and Christ was just a passive observer or you are hell bound.
When you think about it this is the way the new mass is, the priest is the just a passive observer now as the laity, mainly women, runs around the Cramer table. That in itself is a no brainier why young Novus Ordo men want no part of the priesthood and we are hemorrhaging the faithful by huge amounts as the Pew research chart shows.
The Cramer table is what people mistakenly call the altar. It is not, no sacrifice there, unless you consider this watered down version of the Eucharist, I have my doubts that a guy wearing a clown outfit, or giving you a blessing with a guitar, or in a swimming pool standing in front of a floating table can consecrate anything. I have no clue which consecrations are valid and which are not in the Novus Ordo but I will go for the sure thing every time. For me that is the consecration done at the Tridentine mass, preferably pre 1950 missal. But according to the Bergoglian line of popes if you don’t believe and fully accept all this “New church” rubbish lock step you will go to hell.
Here is an excerpt from the Southern Nebraska register that explains the history and use of the Cranmer table. With it you can see the start of the New Liturgical movement and the ultimate goal of the Vatican II council.
As the English tentacle of the Protestant revolution was gaining strength, Thomas Cranmer became a favorite of King Henry VIII and was made the Archbishop of Canterbury. Cranmer’s dream was to eliminate Catholicism from England’s soil through threats, manipulation, and the imprisonment and execution of priests. Cranmer was a Protestant’s Protestant. By 1548, he had removed the references to sacrifice in the Anglican liturgy, and in 1550 he ordered the demolition of the high altars and other distinctively Catholic features of Britain’s churches.Cranmer’s henchmen destroyed statues, entire churches, monasteries, human lives, and many other things as well, but it was the demolition of the high altars which carried the most significance. This was because without an altar, the sacrifice was less familiar or recognizable to the faithful. After the destruction was complete, the Protestants installed wooden tables. This was to try and emphasize that a religious service was merely a reenactment of the Last Supper or a communal meal with symbolism, but no real presence. It was all a direct assault on the Eucharist and Holy Mass. Instead of making the Eucharist the pinnacle of the Mass, Protestants emphasized preaching.
You can see whats going on here. Already the start of New Liturgical movement, rid the Catholic church of any form of Catholicism or church tradition and doctrine.
That brings us to the Bergoglian line of popes. Until now we had only the Borgia line of popes to be concerned with for their political corruption. However Politically and morally corrupt Alexander VI was, he only seemed concerned with cardinal pleasures and he pretty much left church Doctrine alone. The Bergoglian line is different. Between Paul VI and Benedict we just had bad popes, not overly destructive but could be dealt with.
With the Bergoglian line its like the pbs series I Claudius line, “Let all the poisions that lurk in the mud, hatch out”. Bergoglio and Prevost are making the Borgia’s look like rank amateurs. This is a time I think we need to take the situation into our own hands and simply think with our God given conscious. As my mom always said let your conscious be your guide. Personally I don’t know if either one of the Bergoglians were pope or and and at this point I could care less. I plan to continue looking to God for advice and trying to see what he intends regarding Vatican II, the popes since then, and the seemingly withering away of the Catholic faith. I intend to stand strong, practice what I learned, frequent TRADITIONAL MASS and confession, my daily rosary and let the chips fall where they may.
With the upcoming episcopal consecrations from the SSPX we could see some mass excommunications. Do I worry? No! This could be Gods lifeline for the true faith. Remember scripture. Its time we either cut off or pluck out the Prevost.
“If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter into life maimed than with two hands to go into Gehenna, into the unquenchable fire. And if your foot causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter into life crippled than with two feet to be thrown into Gehenna. And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out…” Mark 9:43–47